<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Adsense disabling arbitrage accounts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.domaineditorial.com/2007/05/19/google-adsense-disabling-arbitrage-accounts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.domaineditorial.com/2007/05/19/google-adsense-disabling-arbitrage-accounts/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 12:53:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: knot</title>
		<link>http://www.domaineditorial.com/2007/05/19/google-adsense-disabling-arbitrage-accounts/comment-page-1/#comment-210</link>
		<dc:creator>knot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 16:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domaineditorial.com/archives/2007/05/19/google-adsense-disabling-arbitrage-accounts/#comment-210</guid>
		<description>I am writing a story about Google making millions off of innocent publishers and would like feed back from everyone.If you would like to share your story please contact me .I am only interested in valid sites not Google content sites.
contact me at flipmybic@gmail.com or at www.petpeev.com

I am not interested in getting my account back i only had 38.00 and I signed up as an experiment to see if these stories had any truth to them. Turns out google only wants the big dogs and the google content type sites (why you might ask ) $ that&#039;s why those sites make them tons of $</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am writing a story about Google making millions off of innocent publishers and would like feed back from everyone.If you would like to share your story please contact me .I am only interested in valid sites not Google content sites.<br />
contact me at <a href="mailto:flipmybic@gmail.com">flipmybic@gmail.com</a> or at <a href="http://www.petpeev.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.petpeev.com</a></p>
<p>I am not interested in getting my account back i only had 38.00 and I signed up as an experiment to see if these stories had any truth to them. Turns out google only wants the big dogs and the google content type sites (why you might ask ) $ that&#8217;s why those sites make them tons of $</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seven Mile: Google Shutting Down Lowbrow Arbitrage Plays</title>
		<link>http://www.domaineditorial.com/2007/05/19/google-adsense-disabling-arbitrage-accounts/comment-page-1/#comment-209</link>
		<dc:creator>Seven Mile: Google Shutting Down Lowbrow Arbitrage Plays</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 03:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domaineditorial.com/archives/2007/05/19/google-adsense-disabling-arbitrage-accounts/#comment-209</guid>
		<description>Reported on Frank Michlick&#039;s blog, &#039;DomainEditorial.com&#039;. Frank references the JenSense blog. Looks like Google is trying to scrub the most bush-league implementations that don&#039;t deliver any additional value to visitors.  Still.. as competition and quality rises, today&#039;s high-brow becomes tomorrow&#039;s bush-league. Better to get your hands on a high quality generic domain so you have a fail-over.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reported on Frank Michlick&#8217;s blog, &#8216;DomainEditorial.com&#8217;. Frank references the JenSense blog. Looks like Google is trying to scrub the most bush-league implementations that don&#8217;t deliver any additional value to visitors.  Still.. as competition and quality rises, today&#8217;s high-brow becomes tomorrow&#8217;s bush-league. Better to get your hands on a high quality generic domain so you have a fail-over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.domaineditorial.com/2007/05/19/google-adsense-disabling-arbitrage-accounts/comment-page-1/#comment-208</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 20:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domaineditorial.com/archives/2007/05/19/google-adsense-disabling-arbitrage-accounts/#comment-208</guid>
		<description>Tom, the problem is that the market gap has to be filled by buyers, not sellers. Many are questioning the quality of arbitraged traffic. e.g. if I am bidding for &quot;luxury purple raincoats&quot; and getting lots of traffic from people who searched &quot;cheap raincoats&quot; the conversions ratios won&#039;t hold up.

There are plenty of Adsense alternatives, but the average EPCs are very, very poor. In some cases, under a penny per click. The whole reason PPC to PPC arbitrage works is because of the high paying content bids.

Arbitragers could probably still use Yahoo Publisher Network. I also wouldn&#039;t be suprised if some of these guys go more &quot;black hat&quot;, splitting operations across many different accounts to hide their volume. As for Adbrite filling the Google gap, I don&#039;t expect it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom, the problem is that the market gap has to be filled by buyers, not sellers. Many are questioning the quality of arbitraged traffic. e.g. if I am bidding for &#8220;luxury purple raincoats&#8221; and getting lots of traffic from people who searched &#8220;cheap raincoats&#8221; the conversions ratios won&#8217;t hold up.</p>
<p>There are plenty of Adsense alternatives, but the average EPCs are very, very poor. In some cases, under a penny per click. The whole reason PPC to PPC arbitrage works is because of the high paying content bids.</p>
<p>Arbitragers could probably still use Yahoo Publisher Network. I also wouldn&#8217;t be suprised if some of these guys go more &#8220;black hat&#8221;, splitting operations across many different accounts to hide their volume. As for Adbrite filling the Google gap, I don&#8217;t expect it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom McDonald</title>
		<link>http://www.domaineditorial.com/2007/05/19/google-adsense-disabling-arbitrage-accounts/comment-page-1/#comment-207</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom McDonald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 18:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domaineditorial.com/archives/2007/05/19/google-adsense-disabling-arbitrage-accounts/#comment-207</guid>
		<description>I *so* wish I could buy stock in AdBrite right now.   The arb stuff may not be ideal from Google&#039;s perspective but they&#039;re opening the door wider and wider for competitors -- Someone is going to fill that gap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I *so* wish I could buy stock in AdBrite right now.   The arb stuff may not be ideal from Google&#8217;s perspective but they&#8217;re opening the door wider and wider for competitors &#8212; Someone is going to fill that gap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
