<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SEO session at Web 2.0 Expo. When is the domain traffic session?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.domaineditorial.com/2007/04/16/seo-session-at-web-20-expo-when-is-the-domain-traffic-session/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.domaineditorial.com/2007/04/16/seo-session-at-web-20-expo-when-is-the-domain-traffic-session/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 12:53:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Ball</title>
		<link>http://www.domaineditorial.com/2007/04/16/seo-session-at-web-20-expo-when-is-the-domain-traffic-session/comment-page-1/#comment-190</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Ball</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 02:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domaineditorial.com/archives/2007/04/16/seo-session-at-web-20-expo-when-is-the-domain-traffic-session/#comment-190</guid>
		<description>Hi Frank.  Me again.  ;-)

I&#039;ve never seen any parked domain traffic from Google convert.  Zero.  Zilch.  I have seen conversions from Yahoo! parked domain traffic.  However, the conversion rate was below search.yahoo.com traffic.  I&#039;d be curious to compare contextual advertising ROI to parked domain ROI to search engine advertising ROI.  It&#039;d make it much simpler to make these sorts of comparisons if the search engines would split their traffic from 2 networks to 3.  IOW, if Google would have Search network + Content network + Domain network.  Now, with the parked domain traffic being split between the Search and Content network, it&#039;s difficult to draw accurate conclusions.

Also, I think many people are equating &quot;direct navigation&quot; with &quot;parked domain traffic&quot; and that&#039;s simply not the case.  Most of the stats showing high conversion rates (higher even than organic search traffic) for direct navigation don&#039;t split bookmarked traffic from other forms of direct navigation.  Again, the stats are skewed - and worthless.

Everyone needs accurate stats to make the best decisions.  The fact that no one, including the search engines, is being forthcoming leaves me wondering if someone&#039;s trying to hide something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Frank.  Me again.  <img src='http://www.domaineditorial.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve never seen any parked domain traffic from Google convert.  Zero.  Zilch.  I have seen conversions from Yahoo! parked domain traffic.  However, the conversion rate was below search.yahoo.com traffic.  I&#8217;d be curious to compare contextual advertising ROI to parked domain ROI to search engine advertising ROI.  It&#8217;d make it much simpler to make these sorts of comparisons if the search engines would split their traffic from 2 networks to 3.  IOW, if Google would have Search network + Content network + Domain network.  Now, with the parked domain traffic being split between the Search and Content network, it&#8217;s difficult to draw accurate conclusions.</p>
<p>Also, I think many people are equating &#8220;direct navigation&#8221; with &#8220;parked domain traffic&#8221; and that&#8217;s simply not the case.  Most of the stats showing high conversion rates (higher even than organic search traffic) for direct navigation don&#8217;t split bookmarked traffic from other forms of direct navigation.  Again, the stats are skewed &#8211; and worthless.</p>
<p>Everyone needs accurate stats to make the best decisions.  The fact that no one, including the search engines, is being forthcoming leaves me wondering if someone&#8217;s trying to hide something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

