<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Traffic testing gets more negative press</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.domaineditorial.com/2006/05/19/traffic-testing-gets-more-negative-press/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.domaineditorial.com/2006/05/19/traffic-testing-gets-more-negative-press/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 12:53:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web hosting information at h05t.com</title>
		<link>http://www.domaineditorial.com/2006/05/19/traffic-testing-gets-more-negative-press/comment-page-1/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>Web hosting information at h05t.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2006 07:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domaineditorial.com/archives/2006/05/19/traffic-testing-gets-more-negative-press/#comment-44</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;How to spot domain kiting registrars&lt;/strong&gt;

When a registrar registers a domain name, he has 5 days to cancel. When he cancels he is refunded right away. The problem is some registrars are abusing this to make money. They are registering domain that have expired, set up some quick hosting and pl...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>How to spot domain kiting registrars</strong></p>
<p>When a registrar registers a domain name, he has 5 days to cancel. When he cancels he is refunded right away. The problem is some registrars are abusing this to make money. They are registering domain that have expired, set up some quick hosting and pl&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; GoDaddy finds another forum to publish their opinion on &#8220;Domain Kiting&#8221; - DomainEditorial.com</title>
		<link>http://www.domaineditorial.com/2006/05/19/traffic-testing-gets-more-negative-press/comment-page-1/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; GoDaddy finds another forum to publish their opinion on &#8220;Domain Kiting&#8221; - DomainEditorial.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 15:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domaineditorial.com/archives/2006/05/19/traffic-testing-gets-more-negative-press/#comment-43</guid>
		<description>[...] Basically the article is a reprise of his blog post. Once again, he does provide numbers, but he does not provide any statistics or more detailed information on the registrars that he accuses of registering and deleting the same names continuously within the grace period. As far as we could tell in our research, names do indeed often get tested multiple times in a row. But this testing occurs via different registrars and different corporate entities. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Basically the article is a reprise of his blog post. Once again, he does provide numbers, but he does not provide any statistics or more detailed information on the registrars that he accuses of registering and deleting the same names continuously within the grace period. As far as we could tell in our research, names do indeed often get tested multiple times in a row. But this testing occurs via different registrars and different corporate entities. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
